Red Right 88

In Cleveland, hope dies last

Browns offensive line facing a big test

While everyone is ready to put the Browns Week 1 loss behind them, things won’t get much easier this week in Indianapolis, even if the Colts are without Peyton Manning.

Colts defensive ends Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis would be a handful even if the Browns were healthy along the offensive line. But with right tackle Tony Pashos expected to miss the game this weekend, the task gets that much harder.

Joe Thomas should be able to hold his own at left tackle, but with him having his hands with whomever lines up opposite him, we have to wonder how much help he will be able to give rookie left guard Jason Pinkston.

“It’s funny because (Freeney’s) kind of known for the spin move and for his speed, but he’s one of the strongest players in the league,” Thomas said in published reports. “You see him picking up 330-pound tackles and throwing them on the quarterback.”

Somehow we don’t see Colt McCoy liking that scenario very much.

We’re more worried about Artis Hicks and Oniel Cousins, who will again split time at right tackle as the Browns continue to hope that one of them will seize the role.

“(They) are premier guys,” Hicks said. “They have a special skill set. We give them a chance to pin their ears back and get after the quarterback and they can be a nightmare. We have to keep out of those Freeney-Mathis killer downs.”

“They’re probably the two greatest defensive ends in the league,” Cousins said.

The best way to keep Freeney and Mathis from having an impact is to get the running game untracked, something the Browns were unable to do against Cincinnati.

“I feel like we’re set up here where we can run the football and be somewhat efficient, but we have to go do it,” coach Pat Shurmur said in his Thursday press conference. “Then we have to get the game in a situation where you can stay run/pass and I think that’s when you play the best ball. I believe in running the football, I think it’s important we do it and I feel we’ve got backs that can carry it.”

Let’s hope so, or it could be another long day.

***

We were surprised – and a little chagrined – how easy it was to put the Indians away for the season once it became clear the Tribe was finished.

As soon as the last out was recorded in Detroit’s sweep in Cleveland on Sept. 7, we pretty much checked out on the season, to the point that we didn’t even know what time the games start each night any more.

The start of the NFL season played a large role, but we were still surprised, especially after spending the summer months watching each game from the first pitch.

***

Cleveland fans, more than most, understand the reality of homegrown players leaving in free agency.

And we get the desire of most players to want to sign the biggest contract they can.

But we were still surprised to hear Prince Fielder talk so openly about how this is most likely his last year in a Brewer uniform – especially at a time when the Brewers are in first place and are trying to make the playoffs.

The part we don’t understand is the attitude that Fielder has no choice in all this – if he wants to stay in Milwaukee no one is stopping him. He won’t get as much money, but we’re sure the Brewers can come up with enough to last him at least this lifetime, if not a couple more.

***

Finally, it must be either extremely liberating or profoundly depressing – we can’t figure out which – to live your entire life blaming everyone else when you fail and never accepting responsibility.

It’s only one game, Browns fans

One game.

For any Browns fans still on the ledge, it’s time to get a grip and come back inside.

While Sunday’s loss to Cincinnati was certainly frustrating, it was still only one game.

More importantly, it was the first game under a new coaching staff, installing a new offense and new defense, with several new players, after a shortened off-season that kept the team from getting in the kind of work it needed.

There was certainly much to not like about Sunday’s game, but some of what went wrong can be corrected – starting with the penalties.

Ten penalties in the first half is unacceptable, but there’s no reason to believe it will continue. And blaming the penalties on the coaching staff is a stretch. Unless someone can find the play in the Browns playbook that calls for All-Pro tackle Joe Thomas to commit a false start, the players need to carry the water for the penalties.

“The three offsides penalties were from guys who had played a year ago, so who knows,” Shurmur said in his Monday press conference. “All I know is we’ve got to correct it and everybody in there today is going through that process.

“You practice it, you try to recreate those same situations. You usually get what you emphasize and that’s been emphasized and we have worked on using multiple cadences. It’s a little bit punitive when they jump off sides in practice, although you folks don’t seeing them running laps, we have ways that we take care of it. There is an emphasis there, a general execution that when it doesn’t happen you go back and you re-emphasize it because they didn’t hear enough the first time you do it again. Then you do it again and that is just part of it.”

And it’s curious that, with all the cameras CBS had at the game, there was never a replay of coach Pat Shurmur’s bizarre sideline penalty or the unnecessary roughness penalty on T.J. Ward at the end of the first quarter.

It’s also time to let go of the botched play on the A.J. Green touchdown reception. Somebody should have obviously called a timeout, but there’s absolutely no reason to think that something like that will happen again. And that play didn’t cost the Browns the game.

Don’t forget, the Browns had that same play in the offensive playbook the past two years – if the defense wasn’t ready the quarterback was supposed to call for the snap. Of course, former coach Eric Mangini just wanted the quarterback to fall forward for two or three yards and waste a down. Give the Bengals credit for actually running a play.

There are real issues we need to worry about, however, starting with the offensive line.

The right side of the line is still not very good and it’s starting to look like the coaching staff and front office made a mistake in thinking they could rely on Tony Pashos at right tackle. Pashos is a good player, but he’s given the team no reason to think that he can stay healthy and on the field. And, for now, Oniel Cousins and Artis Hicks are not exactly setting the league on fire.

“I think they both had some good plays and then there were some things where it makes it tough to say this guy is your starter right now,” Shurmur said. “As we move forward, we’ll still keep an eye on what’s happening with the left guard, but as we move forward you might still see a rotation over there at the right side.”

The wide receivers look like they are going to be a concern as well. The group only had six receptions (three by Mohamed Massaquoi; zero; again, by Brian Robiskie) and, like the right side of the line, didn’t show anyone why the team likes the current group.

“There are a lot of factors involved when you don’t get enough completions,” Shurmur said. “Some of it has to do with progression, some of it has to do with the routes, some of it has to do with protection and maybe having to move slightly. Each play is different and I probably have a little different view of it. We’ve just got to be better.”

The running game also looked like a concern, as Peyton Hillis and Montario Hardesty combined for just 75 yards on the ground. Twelve different players alone exceeded that number on Sunday. Much like last year, the Browns need to be able to run the ball if they are going to have any success on offense this season.

Houston ran for 167 yards on Sunday against Indianapolis, the Browns next opponent, so this week could give us a good indication of what the Browns can do in the running game.

Of course, this all ties together. The running game suffers because teams don’t fear the wide receivers and because the right side of the line is struggling. Basically, it’s all big, depressing pile of poo.

But in the big picture it is just one game in what is an ongoing production. The Browns need to figure out what went wrong on Sunday, work it out in practice this week and, come Sunday, just do their jobs.

“The important thing is for the guys to understand their mistakes and then talk about specifically how you are going to correct them,” Shurmur said. “Then you go to work beating the next opponent because it’s a long season. A lot has been made of the first game, but places I have been we have lost the first game or two and still been in the playoffs and you had a terrific years I think that’s the important piece is to keep the focus and move on.”

And, come Sunday at 4:15 p.m., if the Browns are walking off the field with a win over the Colts, everyone will forget what happened against the Bengals.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Well that was special

Like the plot in a bad made-for-TV movie from the ’70s, the Browns broke out their schizophrenic personalities on Sunday, losing to Cincinnati in the home opener and Pat Shurmur’s debut as head coach.

There was a lot of bad, followed by some good in the 27-17 loss.

The good: rookies Phil Taylor and Jabaal Sheard teamed up to knock staring quarterback Andy Dalton out of the game with a wrist injury. Hopefully that is the first of many quarterback hits from the duo this season.

The bad: Ten penalties in the first half, including one we’ve never seen before: an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty on Shurmur for running into an official on the sidelines.

The good: Joe Haden was all over the field, batting down five passes and frustrating Cincy wide receiver A.J. Green all game.

The bad: Green’s 41-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter when the Bengals snapped the ball while the Browns were basically still in their huddle.

“They quick snapped us,” Shurmur said in published reports. “I’ll have to watch the tape, but it’s my understanding they changed personnel, lined up and then quick snapped. There’s rules that go along with that, so we’ll see. My understanding is when the offense changes personnel, the defense is allowed to do so as well and have time to do it.”

The good: Touchdown catches by Ben Watson and Evan Moore, helping the Browns come back from an early 13-0 deficit.

The bad: Cedric Benson had 121 yards rushing – including a game-clinching 39-yard touchdown run – as the Browns still can’t defend the run, giving up 4.2 yards per rush.

The good: Josh Cribbs showed that he is still a threat in the return game. Cribbs returned three kick offs for 91 yards (with a long of 51) and six punts for 58 yards (with a long of 21).

The bad: On Cribbs’ 21-yard return in the fourth quarter, Browns receiver Greg Little blew up Cincy’s punter with a block but his momentum carried him into Cribbs, essentially bringing Cribbs down short of what was shaping up as a big return.

The good: Defensive coordinator Dick Jauron’s new 4-3, play fast, defense produced four sacks, two by D’Qwell Jackson.

The bad: After Green’s TD gave the Bengals a 20-17 lead, the Browns had three more possessions. They ran 12 plays, gained a total of 25 yards with two first downs.

The bad: The offensive line was not good. Two false start penalties on Shaun Lauvao, one on Joe Thomas, Oniel Cousins and Artis Hicks showed why they were available on the waiver wire, the Bengals were able to pressure Colt McCoy all game, just not a good game all around.

The bad: The running game was a non-entity for the Browns. Peyton Hillis had 57 yards on the ground, Montario Hardesty added 18. Not good enough.

The bad: McCoy didn’t look comfortable in the pocket, holding the ball way too long at times. Very surprised by that.

The bad: Wide receiver Brian Robiskie was in mid-season form, putting up his all-too-familiar Blutarsky stat line of 0 receptions for 0 yards. That’s the 11th time he’s pulled off the double zero in 26 career NFL games.

The bad: Punter Richmond McGee had punts of 20, 30 and 28 yards.

OK, that’s enough.

We know some people don’t want to hear it, but it was only one game. As bad as the Browns looked in the first quarter, they looked that good in the second quarter. What happened in the second half was clearly not good, but this is a young team still working to figure things out.

If they are still playing like this in Week 10, we’ll start to get worried. But whether we like it or not as fans, the team is going to continue to have growing pains this year. They are trying to rebuild this team the right way, and there are just no shortcuts along the way.

“The biggest thing is do not let this game trickle over into a whole season,” corner back Sheldon Brown said. “That would be the most frustrating thing.”

Yes it would.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Browns vs. Bengals – Week 1

The Browns kick off the 2011 NFL season on Sunday at home against Cincinnati, looking to do something they’ve only done once since 1999 – win their season-opening game.

That’s right, the Browns are 1-11 in season openers during the past 12 years, with the lone win coming in 2004 as Jeff Garcia led the team to a win at home over Baltimore. What better way to open the new and improved Pat Shurmur era than with a win against the Bengals – who have lost their last three season openers.

Shurmur is looking to become the first Browns coach to win his debut since Bud Carson in 1989. Since then, Bill Belichick, Chris Palmer, Butch Davis, Romeo Crennel and Eric Mangini have all failed to win in their debuts.

It wasn’t always like that, of course. Of the Browns first five head coaches, only Forrest Gregg, in 1975, came up short in his debut. And, of course, the Browns won the most famous opening day game in NFL history – their 35-10 beating of the defending NFL Champion Philadelphia Eagles when the Browns joined the NFL in 1950.

The Opposition

Cincinnati (2010) record: 4-12
Offensive rank (2010): 20th overall/13th passing/27th rushing
Defensive rank (2010): 18th overall/14th passing/19th rushing

What to Watch For

How effective can the Browns be on offense?

Starting wide receiver Mohamed Massaquoi missed the entire preseason with a foot injury, starting left guard Eric Steinbach and projected third-down back Brandon Jackson are out for the season with injuries, starting right tackle Tony Pashos recently spent time in a walking boot and backup running back Montario Hardesty, who the Browns will need to rely on this year so Peyton Hillis doesn’t wear down, only carried the ball five times in the preseason.

Nobody said this was going to be easy.

If the Browns can take a lead into the second half, they should be able to control the clock with Hillis running the ball and McCoy running a short, accurate passing game.

On defense, the Browns catch a break as they will face rookie quarterback Andy Dalton rather than Carson Palmer. That should help the team as it continues to transition to defensive coordinator Dick Jauron’s “play fast, think less” 4-3 defense.

The Browns will have to control running back Cedric Benson. In their 23-20 win over the Bengals last year, the Browns held Benson to 60 yards rushing. In the 19-17 loss, Benson ran for 150 yards.

That may be easier said than done, as the Browns have been extremely poor against the run since 1999, with their average ranking being No. 28.

If the Browns don’t let Benson have a big day, they can go after Dalton with their new front four of Jayme Mitchell, Phil Taylor, Ahtyba Rubin and Jabaal Sheard.

Browns corner back Joe Haden renews his SEC rivalry with wide receiver A.J. Green, which should be a fun match up to watch.

Bengals player that always seemed to torment the Browns

Wide receiver Isaac Curtis, who played for Cincinnati from 1973 to 1984.

Curtis always seemed to have big games against the Browns in the ’70s; in his first four years he caught 33 passes for 739 yards and 11 touchdowns against Cleveland.

Curtis caught 18 percent of his career passes, totaled 20 percent of his career yards and scored 23 percent of his career touchdowns against the Browns.

The Prediction

We’re confident the Browns will get the Shurmur era off on the right foot, breaking the bizarre opening-day losing streak in the process.

We also think the Browns giving 6.5 points is a bit much, so we look for the Browns to win, but not cover.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Delving into the Browns Season

Sunday at Cleveland Browns Stadium, the Browns open the Pat Shurmur era as they take on Cincinnati in the home opener.

A new quarterback, a new offense, the return of the 4-3 defense, improvement in some areas, holes that remain in others, as Browns fans we all know the drill by now.

In addition to the six division games, this year’s schedule once again features old friends in new places, as the Browns take on:

  • Miami, featuring Brian Daboll’s analog, three channels (plus one UHF channel) offense at home on Sept. 25
  • Former first-round draft pick Kameron Wimbley in Oakland on Oct. 16
  • Former first-round draft pick Braylon Edwards in San Francisco on Oct. 30
  • Former Pro Bowl-caliber fullback Lawrence Vickers in Houston on Nov. 6
  • St. Louis, where Shurmur was offensive coordinator the past two years, at home on Nov. 13

Unfortunately, the Browns visit to Arizona won’t offer the opportunity for the defense to abuse former quarterback Derek Anderson, as DA was asked to leave the desert after last season and is now “mentoring” Cam Newton and Jimmy Clausen in Carolina.

The over/under for the Browns victory total this year is 6.5, which shows why the oddsmakers in Las Vegas are the dogs bollocks. It’s easy to talk yourself into both sides of the over/under which looking at the 2011 Browns.

So how will everyone’s favorite team do? We know from past experience the Browns will win a game or two that no one expects them to win (see New England and New Orleans from last year) and lose a game or two that we expect them to win (see Cincinnati and Buffalo from last year).

Let’s break down the schedule into three parts.

Teams the Browns are as good as:

  • Miami
  • Oakland
  • Seattle
  • San Francisco
  • St. Louis
  • Jacksonville
  • Arizona
  • Tennessee

This list is longer than last year and presents nice match-ups for the Browns. Only two of the teams (Miami and San Francisco) were in the Top 10 last year in rush defense, so the Browns should be able to move the ball on the ground against Oakland (29th), Seattle (21st), St. Louis (17th), Jacksonville (22nd), Arizona (30th) and Tennessee (20th).

Plus if you look at the quarterback match-up, the Browns are better than San Francisco, Jacksonville, Seattle and Miami at the position; no worse than Arizona, Oakland and Tennessee; and only St. Louis could make a case for being better with Sam Bradford under center.

None of these teams are offensive powerhouses, either, which means the defense shouldn’t be taxed, forcing the Browns into a shootout.

Can the Browns go 8-0 against this group if they play smart, mistake-free football? Sure. Is that in any way realistic? Nope. But let’s say the Browns will go 4-4 against this group.

Teams that are better than the Browns:

  • Indianapolis
  • Houston

Even with Peyton Manning missing the next few months after undergoing his third operation on his neck, it’s hard to see the Browns beating the Colts on the road. As for Houston, the Texans offense may be too much for the Browns to keep up with.

We’re going to call this group 0-2 for the Browns.

Teams in the AFC North:

Once again, the games within the division are going to be the difference makers for the Browns.

Since the NFL split into four-team divisions in 2002, the Browns have gone 14-40 in the division. That includes matching 1-5 records in each of the past three seasons.

With Pittsburgh and Baltimore still in the division it’s going to be hard for the Browns to make any headway on improving that mark, but they simply have to start getting it done. The Bengals proved two years ago that a mediocre team (4-6 outside the division) can have success by taking care of business within the AFC North (the Bengals were 6-0 that year to emerge as one of the weakest division winners in recent history).

As good as the Steelers and Ravens are expected to be this year, should it really be too much to ask that the Browns win one of the four games they play against those team’s this year?

As for the Bengals, they may be one of the worst teams in the NFL this year with a rookie quarterback (Andy Dalton) throwing to a rookie wide receiver (A.J. Green) that Joe Haden shut down in college. If the Browns can’t take at least one of the two games from the Bengals this year (why not get it out of the way on Sunday?) then we’ll know things went really wrong this year.

Let’s try to stay optimistic and give the Browns a 3-3 record (sweep the Bengals, win one against either Baltimore or Pittsburgh) within the division this year.

Add it all up, and the Browns finish with seven wins, covering the over bet on the season total. We said six wins last year (with an over/under of 5.5) and just missed out; no way that happens two years in a row.

The first step in the journey starts Sunday against the Bengals. The Brown and Orange are almost back. Whatever happens this year, we can be sure it won’t be dull.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Tribe removes all doubt

If there was still any hope among the fan base that the Indians could make a miracle run to overtake Detroit for the division title, the Tribe removed any doubt that the season is over on Wednesday.

Not even Shelly Duncan taking Justin Verlander deep for a pair of two-run homers (wonder if that will cost Verlander any Cy Young votes?) could prevent the Indians from being swept by the Tigers at Progressive Field.

“They took care of business; obviously, we didn’t,” Indians manager Manny Acta said after the game. “You can’t give up, though. Things can change in a week.”

Sorry, Manny, but they really can’t. The Tribe now sits 9.5 games back of Detroit and that, truly, is it for the season.

The Indians actually led, 4-2, before Tony Sipp threw gas on the fire in the seventh inning, giving up a grand slam to Victor Martinez.

On the season, Sipp has let in 14 of the 35 inherited base runners – that’s 40 percent – (by comparison, Rafael Perez has only let in 6 of 39), which shows that you can’t judge a reliever by his ERA alone.

Everything that can be said about this team has been said, we’re tapped out.

Thankfully, we’re only four days away from the Browns starting the 2011 NFL season, so maybe its for the best that the Indians are stepping aside for Cleveland’s No. 1 team.

(Photo by The Associated Press)

RIP, 2011 Cleveland Indians

We know there are still 20+ games to go, but the Indians 2011 season came to an end Monday afternoon when Victor Martinez’ three-run homer cleared the right field fence.

There are plenty of reasons why the Indians came up short in their attempt to win the division – primarily the seemingly never-ending string of injuries which led to too many at-bats for bench players – but the main one is the Tribe doesn’t have Justin Verlander.

According to Bill Simmons’ column last Friday at Grantland, the Tigers are 21-8 when Verlander starts and 54-54 when he doesn’t (that was before the weekend series where the White Sox rolled over and played dead).

Fourteen times Verlander has followed a Tigers loss by winning the next game. He’s pitched at least six innings in each of his 29 starts. He’s thrown 104 pitches or more in every start. He’s first in wins (20), WHIP, strikeouts, innings pitched; second in ERA (trailing Jered Weaver by just 0.10) and WAR (trailing only Bautista).

That right there is the biggest reason why the Indians went from 7.5 games up to 7.5 games back in the standings – they just don’t have anyone who can put up numbers like Verlander.

Take Verlander off the Tigers and even with their big payroll they are right there with the Tribe, hovering around .500.

***

As if the end of the season wasn’t bad enough, the Tribe announced on Tuesday that Carlos Carrasco will undergo Tommy John surgery and miss the 2012 season.

“Conservative management of the injury failed,’’ head trainer Lonnie Soloff said in published reports. “So after several medical opinions, Carlos will undergo a UCL reconstruction. Dr. David Aitchek will perform the operation in New York on Wednesday. Recovery time for the surgery is 12-18 months, and we are hopeful that Carlos can begin game activity in 12 months.’’

So, for Cliff Lee (16-7, 2.47 ERA this season), the Tribe has Carrasco (Tommy John surgery), Jason Knapp (shoulder surgery in July), Lou Marson and Jason Donald.

Just great.

At least the Indians still have pitching depth in the minors – oh wait, no they don’t.

***

Sounds like we may be seeing Artis Hicks on the field for the Browns on Sunday, either at left guard if the team believes fifth-round pick Justin Pinkston isn’t ready, or possibly at right tackle if Tony Pashos’ injured foot is more than just “sore” to use coach Pat Shurmur’s words.

Hicks sounds ready to do whatever the team needs.

“I’ve played everywhere except for center,” the 10-year veteran told The Beacon Journal. “I’ve always been a guy that’s just tried to come in and do what’s asked of me no matter what it is. I don’t expect this to be any different. I don’t have any expectations other than to go out there and just try to learn the system and try to fit in with these guys.”

***

Finally, Browns team president Mike Holmgren made what we think is his first mistake since arriving in town when he decided the Browns will wear all white at home this season.

We love the brown jerseys over the white pants and a look at the schedule leads us to believe we won’t be seeing that look much – if at all – this season.

The Steelers, Ravens and Bengals don’t wear white at home, so those games are out. Same with the Raiders, 49ers and the Cardinals. The Texans have it on their website that they will wear blue jerseys against the Browns and the Colts most likely will as well.

So it looks like we’ll be getting the monochrome look for the entire year. At least the brown pants won’t be making a comeback, which is some small consolation.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Taking a look at the Browns roster

The Cleveland Browns set their 53-man roster over the weekend and, overall, we’re about as comfortable as we can be about a rebuilding team coming off consecutive 5-11 seasons.

The good news is the team has gotten considerably younger as general manager Tom Heckert has been able to purge the team of a larger number of its older players since arriving in town at the start of the last year.

The main drawback, as it always seems to be with the Browns, is depth, especially at running back, along the defensive line and at linebacker.

The Browns are all-in with Colt McCoy at quarterback this year, and we’re fine with that. The team needs to figure out what they have in McCoy in an attempt to finally stop the revolving door at quarterback.

If McCoy shows he can be a starting quarterback in the league, then the team can move on to bigger issues in the draft and free agency. If he craps the bed this year, the Browns have options in next year’s draft to fix the problem. If he lands somewhere in the middle, they can still figure things out.

Seneca Wallace remains a capable back up – if he has to go in for a half or a game, the team will be OK. If he has to take over as the full-time starter, then we’ll know things have taken a turn for the worse.

It’s hard to miss what you never had, but we’re worried the Browns will miss Brandon Jackson, who was supposed to take some of the pressure off of Peyton Hillis this fall. Hopefully Montario Hardesty can stay healthy and be productive because, if not, it’s easy to see Hillis wearing down again come Thanksgiving.

We like the fact that the Browns are building a beefy backfield with Hillis (240 pounds), Hardesty (225) and Owen Marecic (248); the thought of them pounding it out against Pittsburgh and Baltimore is appealing, but we’d feel a little better if Lawrence Vickers was still leading the way.

Eric Steinbach leaves a huge hole to fill at left guard, but if someone has to get hurt at least it happened early enough that rookie Jason Pinkston got plenty of reps with the first-team offense. We like the pick up of veteran lineman Artis Hicks, who has 68 career starts, 57 of them coming at the guard position. He will provide good back-up if (when?) Pinkston struggles.

The good news on Pinkston? He gets to lineup between Joe Thomas and Alex Mack – you can’t find a better situation for a rookie lineman that between those two.

The receiving group is, to be generous, a continual work in progress. Individually, there’s no real standout, but taken collectively with the tight ends and the Browns might be better than OK this year.

If McCoy does his job correctly in the West Coast offense, he will be spreading the ball around which should make up for the Browns not having a stud wide receiver. Between Josh Cribbs, Brian Robiskie, Mohamed Massaquoi, Greg Little, Ben Watson and Evan Moore, the Browns should be able to put together an average passing attack, which will make it that much easier for them to run the ball.

And if the majority of the passes are dinks and dunks, that’s OK with us. A seven-yard completion on first down is the same as a seven-yard run – both mean second-and-short, which is all good for an offense. We’re definitely looking forward to seeing what Little and Cribbs can do with the ball when McCoy hits them in stride.

Defensively, after we don’t know how many years of watching the Browns try to fit round pegs into square holes in a futile effort to build a 3-4 defense, the 4-3 has finally come back to Cleveland.

It’s going to be fun – and at times frustrating – watching rookies Phil Taylor and Jabaal Sheard chasing quarterbacks this year, Ahtyba Rubin will be solid as usual, and we’re interested to see if Jayme Mitchell can reward the faith the front office has put into him.

With linebackers Scott Fujita, Chris Gocong and D’Qwell Jackson, the starting front seven isn’t all that bad. The problem, again, is going to be depth. If (when?) someone goes down with an injury the drop off from the starters to the back-ups is big.

We have a feeling that if the league would have had a regular off season, the front seven would look a little bit different than it does today, but there’s nothing the Browns can do about that now. They are still one draft and one true free-agency period away from building a solid front seven.

Joe Haden and T.J. Ward should be even better in their second season, especially in defensive coordinator Dick Jauron’s “play faster” defense. Hopefully Sheldon Brown can hold up at the other corner, safety Usama Young is a Kent State guy so we don’t worry about him, and Mike Adams would like you to know that you can’t stop Mike Adams, you can only hope to contain Mike Adams.

The secondary is another area where they team got younger, with rookies Buster Skrine, James Dockery and Eric Hagg joining the squad.

Much like with Steinbach, you can’t underestimate the loss of punter Reggie Hodges but, again, at least it came earlier enough in training camp that the Browns had an opportunity to get a decent replacement.

Richmond McGee looks like he’ll be OK as the punter, we never have to worry about Phil Dawson or Ryan Pontbriand, and it may not matter who handles the kickoff return duties with the new rules in place.

So is this is Browns team that will compete for the division title this year? No, the lack of depth at key positions and lack of experience at others will be too much to overcome, especially in the AFC North.

But do we expect them to be competitive and make actual progress – unlike the imaginary progress at the end of the 2009 season – this year? Most certainly.

It’s easy to see areas where the roster is better than it was at this same time last year.

And while the Browns are still a ways away from being consistently competitive, with the season-opener less than a week away, we’re OK with the direction they’re heading.

Is first-year success bad for a coach?

Heard an interesting conversation the other day on Sirius NFL Radio when the hosts (may have been Bob Poppa and Ross Tucker) were discussing first-year head coaches.

The discussion centered on how fans (and the media) perceive coaches and, if you are successful your first year on the job, do the expectations become unrealistic for years two, three and four?

They used Miami coach Tony Sparano as an example, who led the Dolphins to the playoffs his first year in 2008 by going 11-5 against a weak schedule. The Fins have been 7-9 each of the past two years, and now Sparano is an early season candidate for “coach on the hot seat” honors (thankfully we don’t have to worry about that nonsense this year in Cleveland).

So because the team had a good first year under Sparano, expectations were raised, perhaps unrealistically, which lead to increased pressure on Sparano.

The hosts talked about whether it would be better for a first-year coach, who is generally busy that first year cleaning out the former coach’s players, to have a poorer record the first year to keep fan expectations realistic, then build off that as they work to remake their team.

They weren’t advocating that as an official team strategy – no Suck for Luck campaign, for example – more of just a conversation to fill time while we all wait for the start of the regular season.

We thought it was interesting, though, because we seem to go through coaches here in Cleveland at a rather quick rate.

It’s pretty safe to say that we are all beyond ready for the Browns to start winning, so we’d hate to think of the team intentionally taking a step back this season. But we’re confident the team will bring its best each week.

It’s possible the Browns will finish with more wins than last year’s 5-11 team, simply because they play an easier schedule this year. Out are New England, the Jets, New Orleans and Atlanta. In are the NFC West.

But that’s not what we’re looking for. We don’t want a team that is competitive only when it has an easy schedule (think 2007), but one that can compete every year, no matter how the schedule shakes out (yes, we’re going to say it: think Pittsburgh. No matter what, you can always go into the season expecting the Steelers to win double digits and compete for a playoff spot).

The Browns need to continue working to build a system that will make the team competitive every year. While it would be great to see the team go 10-6 this year, that doesn’t help if they are 5-11 the next two years. We could live with 6-10 this year if that turns into 9-7 next season and 11-5 the year after that. We have to stop judging everything on a one-year basis.

We’re not sure yet how good the Browns will be this season, but we are sure of one thing: no matter what the final record is, fan expectations will be out of proportion to reality.

It’s what makes us all Browns fans, after all.

(Photo by The Associated Press)

We’ll have what Jack’s having

What in the world has gotten into Jack Hannahan?

And how can the Indians make sure the rest of the team catches it?

After homering in the second and again in the sixth inning Wednesday night against Oakland, and driving in the game-winning run in the 16th inning, Hannahan is hitting .444 (16-for-36) with three home runs and 11 RBI on the Tribe’s current homestand.

Whatever Hannahan is doing is working, we just wish he could pass it on the rest of the lineup.

***

Despite rumors that Arsenal was targeting American Clint Dempsey it looks like Dempsey is staying at Fulham as the transfer window has closed for now.

Not to bag on Fulham or Craven Cottage, but it would have been nice to see Dempsey have a chance on a bigger stage that, despite its early season woes, Arsenal can provide.

***

Ever wonder what footwear Katie Whitham keeps in her black shoulder bag? Then head over to Waiting for Next Year for an interview with the sideline reporter for SportsTime Ohio at Tribe games.

All kidding aside, it’s a really good read. Check it out.

(Photo by The Plain Dealer)

Post Navigation